In recent months, politics has greatly influenced the markets of the USSR Autonomous Office: we hear from everywhere about the fall of sales that in the Russian Federation, that in Ukraine. It was thought that this state of affairs has everywhere. As it turned out, everything is completely wrong. Today I will show you statistics according to which the joint venture of the Americans and Uzbeks UZ DEU has significantly increased the production of a car in 2014 compared to 2013. So this is possible in our times.
It is clear that the Uzbeks have a powerful support from Americans. General Motors can have financial problems as a whole, in his USA. But by the standards, the post of USSR is a cool and powerful enterprise, the reputation of which is extremely powerful. I think this helps the Uzbeks a lot in the promotion of a car from the DEU UZ. What is only mega popularity Lacetti!
For example, I did not know about such a wide model range of Daewoo Uz: Matiz and Nexia from DEU, Lacetti, Captivist, Spark, Malibu, Cobalt, Orlando from the Chevrolet and her car Genta (Restyling Lacetti). How do you like a set? If you notice, a car from different market segments and with names. And this is important, because in our expanses people love popular and not very expensive cars. And here one matiz costs a lot, because it is excellent for sale.
In September 2014, it became known that the company will produce hatch Aveo. Moreover, from new ones, t. e. post -taglogo (unlike the Ukrainian car zaz, which issues a more old version under its brand of the view. And also plus the Uzbek enterprise – lovers of small cars in such a body now with them.
For 2014, UZ DEU increased the production of a car by 6 percent. Like me, this is a very good result. Almost everyone falls all over the world, and the Uzbeks are growing! So. There are models whose sales have fallen. The same Matiz sagged 58 percent. But Malibu grew by 76. T. e. There is a process of adaptation for consumer demand.
I note that in the enterprise of the DEU UZ, the state of Uzbekistan has a share. And who after that will say about the inefficiency of the entire state, about the inability of the state top manager to manage effectively? Here is a great example. And the Chinese have a top brand FAW belongs to the state.
